[Issue 17474] non-property being treated as a property

via Digitalmars-d-bugs digitalmars-d-bugs at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 9 23:22:18 PDT 2017


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17474

--- Comment #8 from Eyal <eyal at weka.io> ---
Requiring @property on a for a=b to invoke a(b) sounds much more reasonable
than the opposite.

I don't see how a=b invoking a(b) when a isn't a @property is justifiable.

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list