[Issue 8007] Wrong documentation for '>>'

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8007

--- Comment #5 from berni44 <bugzilla at d-ecke.de> ---
(In reply to timon.gehr from comment #4)
> Please stop closing issues just for the sake of it.

I do not close issues "just for the sake of it". I closed this one, because I
think it's invalid. And I wrote, why I think so. And as Don has IMHO expressed
that opinion too, there is some justification in doing so. And in doing so I'll
give the next one, who is closing this as invalid even more justification.

> It's clearly not true that `>>` is a signed right shift.

If it were so "clearly not true", as you state, I should see this too. But I
can't, so your statement is wrong.

--