[Issue 19665] Package modules are meaningless

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19665

--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev <dlang-bugzilla at thecybershadow.net> ---
(In reply to Adam D. Ruppe from comment #4)
> It does bug me that it is inconsistent with other modules though: in no
> other case does the filename matter (aside from automatic lookups). You are
> allowed to have blargh.d with module whatever.you.want;. So why must this
> one special case require the package.d filename?

Personally, I always considered that mismatching module and file names was just
the implementation being overly permissive. It only works with certain build
systems and breaks a number of other assumptions for various tooling, so I'm
happy to write that off in the "it works but don't do that" category.

--