[Issue 19595] Formally define aggregate type in documentation

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Jan 19 15:48:44 UTC 2019


Nathan S. <n8sh.secondary at hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Nathan S. <n8sh.secondary at hotmail.com> ---
Closing as invalid, for some reason I didn't find the definition before.
Although probably the phrase "Delegates are an aggregate of two pieces of data"
(https://dlang.org/spec/type.html) should not be used if delegates are
considered "derived types" rather than "user-defined types" and only the latter
are considered aggregates.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list