[Issue 21449] New: parser reject constructor call to const(SomeStructDecl)
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Dec 3 09:10:00 UTC 2020
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21449
Issue ID: 21449
Summary: parser reject constructor call to
const(SomeStructDecl)
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: dmd
Assignee: nobody at puremagic.com
Reporter: b2.temp at gmx.com
using the ctor as an unary in an expstmt is an error (no effect) but for static
opCall this can be valid.
---
struct Foo
{
static opCall(T)(T t){}
}
void main()
{
Foo(0); //OK
const(Foo(0)); //NG
}
---
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:14: Error: unexpected `(` in declarator
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:15: Error: basic type expected, not `0`
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:15: Error: found `0` when expecting `)`
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:17: Error: no identifier for declarator `const Foo(_error_)`
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:17: Error: semicolon expected following function declaration
>/tmp/temp_7F00CFE49E90.d:13:17: Error: found `)` instead of statement
found by Herringway as seen on IRC.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list