[Issue 20978] New: Add versioning to phobos

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 25 19:56:41 UTC 2020


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20978

          Issue ID: 20978
           Summary: Add versioning to phobos
           Product: D
           Version: D2
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P1
         Component: phobos
          Assignee: nobody at puremagic.com
          Reporter: john.michael.hall at gmail.com

In the following thread
https://forum.dlang.org/post/hpedmfmtlpewsbgjidpn@forum.dlang.org
Andre suggested adding versioning to phobos
https://forum.dlang.org/post/rc3a7r$178f$1@digitalmars.com

The scheme is further developed in these two posts
https://forum.dlang.org/post/nwkqajtkulvilnvqhipb@forum.dlang.org
https://forum.dlang.org/post/eceiamvenhqzvzptktir@forum.dlang.org

As an example, consider restructuring phobos, such that the directory is
something like below (assuming that this approach began in 2_89_0 for the sake
of simplicity)

  src
   |-- 2_89
   |      |-- 2_89_0
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      |-- 2_89_1
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      +-- latest
   |             |-- moduleA
   |             |      ..
   |             +-- moduleZZZZ
   |-- 2_90
   |      |-- 2_90_0
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      |-- 2_90_1
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      |-- 2_90_2
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      +-- latest
   |             |-- moduleA
   |             |      ..
   |             +-- moduleZZZZ
   |-- 2_91
   |      |-- 2_91_0
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      |-- 2_91_1
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      +-- latest
   |             |-- moduleA
   |             |      ..
   |             +-- moduleZZZZ
   |-- 2_92
   |      |-- 2_92_0
   |      |      |-- moduleA
   |      |      |      ..
   |      |      +-- moduleZZZZ
   |      +-- latest
   |             |-- moduleA
   |             |      ..
   |             +-- moduleZZZZ
   +-- latest
          |-- moduleA
          |      ..
          +-- moduleZZZZ



-------------

Setting this up initially, we would have

module std.2_89.2_89_0.moduleA;
//and then definitions of funA, funB, etc.

module std.2_89.latest.moduleA;
public import std.2_89.2_89_0.moduleA;

//saved to ./src/latest/modulaA
module std.moduleA;

version(std_latest) {
    version = std_2_89;
}
version(std_stable) {
    version = std_2_89;
}
version(std_2019) {
    version = std_2_89;
}
version(std_2_89) {
    public import std.2_89.latest.moduleA;

-------------

If we have the bug fix 2.89.1 to funB, then we have would update as below

//no change to std.2_89.2_89_0.moduleA

module std.2_89.2_89_1.moduleA;
public import std.2_89.2_89_0.moduleA; //might need to make these selective
//update to funB

module std.2_89.latest.moduleA;
public import std.2_89.2_89_1.moduleA;

//no change to std.moduleA

-------------

For the next version 2.90.0, then we would update as follows

//no change to std.2_89.2_89_0.moduleA
//no change to std.2_89.2_89_1.moduleA
//no change to std.2_89.latest.moduleA

module std.2_90.2_90_0.moduleA;
public import std.2_89.latest.moduleA;
//any new functions or changes from 2_89

module std.2_90.latest.moduleA;
public import std.2_90.2_90_0.moduleA;

//saved to ./src/latest/modulaA
module std.moduleA;

version(std_latest) {
    version = std_2_90;
}
version(std_stable) {
    version = std_2_89;
}
version(std_2020) {
    version = std_2_90;
}
version(std_2019) {
    version = std_2_89;
}
version(std_2_89) {
    public import std.2_89.latest.moduleA;
}
version(std_2_90) {
    public import std.2_90.latest.moduleA;
}

and so on up thereafter.

One benefit of this design are that it would allow users access to old versions
of phobos through use of version statement. It would also allow bug fixes to
old versions of phobos to propagate upward, though patches will need to be
manually applied when a function is given a different implementation in a later
version. 

One consequence of this design is that it avoids the repetition of code through
the use of public imports. However, this also means that the most recent
version of each function is not actually in the "latest" folders. They are
spread out among many files, which requires the user to search for it. If this
is considered a significant problem, then the underlying files, such as module
std.2_90.latest.moduleA can avoid public imports of past versions. The rest of
the structure can remain the same, though it would require more manual
adjustment if there are bug fixes in old versions of phobos.

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list