[Issue 7417] One-definition rule for version specification - allow version expressions

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 10 19:09:54 UTC 2021


https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7417

--- Comment #12 from anonymous4 <dfj1esp02 at sneakemail.com> ---
I'm in favor of addition of version(true) and version(false), because "all" and
"none" aren't keywords and I'm never sure if I typed them correctly, but
failure to type them correctly is often silent. Also version(true) and
version(false) feel more intuitively understandable than version(all) and
version(none).

--


More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list