The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

January 2022 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Jan 1 00:05:58 UTC 2022
Ending: Mon Jan 31 22:27:40 UTC 2022
Messages: 441

• [Issue 10013] `inout` constructor sometimes fails to create immutable object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10013] `inout` constructor sometimes fails to create immutable object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 10584] Unhelpful error default constructing nested class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12326] [IMPLEMENTATION] Move hidden debug switches into a backend-specific struct.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12326] [IMPLEMENTATION] Move hidden debug switches into a backend-specific struct.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12328] [IMPLEMENTATION] Target::critsecsize should be a runtime or library inferred value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 12595] dup/idup shouldn't be property functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13343] Strange behaviour aliasing struct members   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13416] dead-lock in FreeBSD suspend handler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13416] dead-lock in FreeBSD suspend handler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 13551] std.conv.to for std.typecons tuples too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14488] Deprecate Imaginary and complex types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 14892] -profile=gc doesn't account for GC API allocations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15370] Some way to manually allocate the closure for delegates to nested functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15712] nested functions in unittests extern(C) not applied   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 15843] D-type mangling used for extern(C) (extern) function declaration inside function body, on LDC, GDC, and DMD.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 16484] regression(2.064) Overloaded empty funcs trigger AssertError: "Called `get' on null Nullable"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17294] Incorrect -profile=gc data   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 17635] [REG 2.066.0] cannot convert unique immutable(int)** to immutable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18115] [REG2.078-b1] case where && is not shortcut anymore in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18235] Group logically similar tests into the same module in the D2 testsuite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18235] Group logically similar tests into the same module in the D2 testsuite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18235] Group logically similar tests into the same module in the D2 testsuite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18235] Group logically similar tests into the same module in the D2 testsuite   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18362] Build dmd with LTO and PGO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18362] Build dmd with LTO and PGO   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18857] [std.experimental.logger] use NullLogger as the default   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18910] Non-compile-time-constant parameter default values not respected when passed as alias to a template function (with some indirection)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 18917] Default Value for Function-Type Template Value-Parameter Causes Conflicts in Instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19178] Static initialization of 2d static arrays in structs produces garbage or doesn't compile sometimes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19191] Memory allocation failure with -profile=gc and dynamic array of opaque handles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19294] Support for array operations with Complex! is incomplete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19601] Running -profile=gc when no gc is logged leaves old misleading file contents   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19601] Running -profile=gc when no gc is logged leaves old misleading file contents   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19601] Running -profile=gc when no gc is logged leaves old misleading file contents   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 19715] AutoImplement `self` and `parent` aliases are incorrect for overloaded functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20157] [diagnostic] Name suggest for override should only list virtual functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20378] Main function specification is incomplete   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20509] implicit conversions considered before IFTI   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20520] Runtime segfault when taking typeid of a class instanciated within an enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20576] TemplateTypeParameter and TemplateValueParameter default values are not checked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20809] return statement might access memory from destructed temporary   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20884] Using getMember with a type as first argument can lose type qualifiers.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20884] Using getMember with a type as first argument can lose type qualifiers.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 20956] [DIP1000] @safe defeated by closure capturing ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21014] aa.byKeyValue, byKey, byValue very under-documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21170] Can not instantiate a class instance using inout constructor.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21457] std.functional.partial ignores function overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21892] deprecation warning on reflection should be suppressed or at least suppressable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21892] deprecation warning on reflection should be suppressed or at least suppressable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21892] deprecation warning on reflection should be suppressed or at least suppressable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21956] ice on foreach over an AA of noreturn   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 21974] ImportC: support __builtin_va_list, __builtin_va_start, __builtin_va_arg, __builtin_va_end   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22014] Wrong MSVC++ mangling of wchar_t   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22127] compiler assertion failure parser on UDA and function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22127] compiler assertion failure parser on UDA and function literal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22130] [REG2.080.1][DIP1000] pure factory functions stopped working   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22137] -preview=dip1000 enables visibility checks for tupleof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22137] -preview=dip1000 enables visibility checks for tupleof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22139] Compiler special cases object.dup when compiling with -preview=dip1000   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22139] Compiler special cases object.dup when compiling with -preview=dip1000   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22163] [REG 2.094.0] wrong code with static float array and delegate accessing it   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22185] std.array.array() doesn't handle throwing element copying   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22185] std.array.array() doesn't handle throwing element copying   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22234] __traits(getLinkage) returns wrong value for extern(System) functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22248] ImportC: Specify C compiler when multiple options are available   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22291] __traits(arguments) to return a tuple of the function arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22298] [DIP1000] Nested function's scope parameters can be assigned to variables in enclosing function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22298] [DIP1000] Nested function's scope parameters can be assigned to variables in enclosing function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22298] [DIP1000] Nested function's scope parameters can be assigned to variables in enclosing function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22365] Compiler crash: tcs.body_ null in StatementSemanticVisitor.visit(TryCatchStatement) in semantic3 pass (dmd/statementsem.d:3956)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22365] Compiler crash: tcs.body_ null in StatementSemanticVisitor.visit(TryCatchStatement) in semantic3 pass (dmd/statementsem.d:3956)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22365] Compiler crash: tcs.body_ null in StatementSemanticVisitor.visit(TryCatchStatement) in semantic3 pass (dmd/statementsem.d:3956)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22365] Compiler crash: tcs.body_ null in StatementSemanticVisitor.visit(TryCatchStatement) in semantic3 pass (dmd/statementsem.d:3956)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22469] DWARF: some debug info types are named wrongly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22489] C header generation ignores custom mangling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22520] darwin: crt_destructor functions not executed on OSX 12   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22532] std.experimental.logger Change default log level to LogLevel.warning, or LogLevel.off   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22535] ImportC: gcc/clang math intrinsics are rejected.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22535] ImportC: gcc/clang math intrinsics are rejected.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22536] CTFE: Missing destruction of array literal argument for scope slice parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22536] CTFE: Missing destruction of array literal argument for scope slice parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22540] Instantiation modifies dependant type of value / alias template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22540] Instantiation modifies dependant type of value / alias template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22540] Instantiation modifies dependant type of value / alias template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22540] Instantiation modifies dependant type of value / alias template parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22541] DIP1000: Resolve ambiguity of ref-return-scope parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22552] moveEmplace wipes context pointer of nested struct contained in non-nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22568] -target option does nothing in compilation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22587] ternary with function call and assert(0) leads to cod1 assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22587] ternary with function call and assert(0) leads to cod1 assertion   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22598] importC: Add support for __extension__ keyword   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22609] [REG2.097] std.format.format fails for opEquals overloads without int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22611] ImportC: Need better error messages involving structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22614] Wrong copy constructor is called depending on context   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22617] CTFE rejects modification of copied static array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] [REG2.098.1] Nullable regression introduced by new copy ctor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] Missing inout substitution for __copytmp temporaries caused by copy ctors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] Missing inout substitution for __copytmp temporaries caused by copy ctors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] Missing inout substitution for __copytmp temporaries caused by copy ctors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22619] Missing inout substitution for __copytmp temporaries caused by copy ctors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22623] ImportC: typedef'd struct definition tag not put in symbol table   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22623] ImportC: typedef'd struct definition tag not put in symbol table   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22623] ImportC: typedef'd struct definition tag not put in symbol table   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22623] ImportC: typedef'd struct definition tag not put in symbol table   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22624] importC: bit field misaligns following members in D struct .init   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22624] ImportC: struct members in static initializer misaligned following bit field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22624] ImportC: struct members in static initializer misaligned following bit field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22624] ImportC: struct members in static initializer misaligned following bit field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22624] ImportC: struct members in static initializer misaligned following bit field   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22631] ImportC: support C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22632] Crash happens when CTFE compares an associative array to null using ==   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22638] [ICE] cod4.d: Assertion `cast(int)sz > 0' failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22638] [REG 2.096][ICE] cod4.d: Assertion `cast(int)sz > 0' failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22638] [REG 2.096][ICE] cod4.d: Assertion `cast(int)sz > 0' failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22638] [REG 2.096][ICE] cod4.d: Assertion `cast(int)sz > 0' failed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22640] New: core.exception.AssertError at std/experimental/allocator/package.d(3738): Assertion failure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22641] New: dmd reports wrong line number (Error: expression ... is not a valid template value argument)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22642] New: test runner is determined to add -fPIC and -fPIE switches blocking Windows cross compiles   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22643] Another heisenbug in macOS 12.x x64, DMD (latest)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22643] Another heisenbug in macOS 12.x x64, DMD (latest)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22643] Another heisenbug in macOS 12.x x64, DMD (latest)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22643] New: Another heisenbug in macOS 12.x x64, DMD (latest)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22644] New: Using @disable on enum members produces unrelated errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22644] Using @disable on enum members produces unrelated errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22644] Using @disable on enum members produces unrelated errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Compilation fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] Linking fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22645] New: Compilation fails with fatal error LNK1318: Unexpected PDB-error: OK (0) ""   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22646] New: [REG2.099] CT bounds checking ignores short circuit evaluation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22647] [std.variant.Variant] Cannot compare types compliant with null comparison with 'null'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22647] [std.variant.Variant] Cannot compare types compliant with null comparison with 'null'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22647] [std.variant.Variant] Cannot compare types compliant with null comparison with 'null'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22647] [std.variant.Variant] Cannot compare types compliant with null comparison with 'null'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22647] New: [std.variant.Variant] Cannot compare types compliant with null comparison with 'null'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22648] [std.variant.Variant] Incorrectly written unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22648] [std.variant.Variant] Incorrectly written unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22648] [std.variant.Variant] Incorrectly written unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22648] New: [std.variant.Variant] Incorrectly written unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22649] New: DUB: recursive `copyFiles` is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22650] [REG 2.097][ICE] cod4.d:424: Assertion 'cast(int)sz > 0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22650] [REG 2.097][ICE] cod4.d:424: Assertion 'cast(int)sz > 0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22650] [REG 2.097][ICE] cod4.d:424: Assertion 'cast(int)sz > 0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22650] New: [REG 2.097][ICE] cod4.d:424: Assertion 'cast(int)sz > 0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22651] New: undefined reference to ModuleInfo when using imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22652] importC: Braceless initializer of nested struct is rejected.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22652] importC: Braceless initializer of nested struct is rejected.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22652] New: importC: Braceless initializer of nested struct is rejected.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22653] @safe @nogc delegate should allocate but doesn't, calls member function on dead object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22653] New: @safe @nogc delegate should allocate but doesn't, calls member function on dead object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22654] New: AST for UDA annotated struct with destructor does not run destructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] Disassembler assertion on "rdtsc"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] Disassembler assertion on "rdtsc"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] Disassembler assertion on rdtsc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] Disassembler assertion on rdtsc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] Disassembler assertion on rdtsc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22655] New: Disassembler assertion on "rdtsc"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22656] New: SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22656] SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22656] SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22656] SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22656] SSE2 instructions have inconsistent layouts in the disassembler output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22657] New: AVX SIMD Instructions are decoded correctly but printed badly.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22658] New: Inline asm rejects [RIP+RAX] but not [RAX+RIP]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22659] [REG master] Error: declaration '(S[2] arr = __error__;)' is not yet implemented in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22659] [REG master] Error: declaration '(S[2] arr = __error__;)' is not yet implemented in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22659] [REG master] Error: declaration '(S[2] arr = __error__;)' is not yet implemented in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22659] [REG master] Error: declaration '(S[2] arr = __error__;)' is not yet implemented in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22659] New: [REG master] Error: declaration '(S[2] arr = __error__;)' is not yet implemented in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22660] New: std.experimental.allocator randomly fails unittest   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22661] Functions cannot be interpreted while being compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22661] Functions cannot be interpreted while being compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22661] Functions cannot be interpreted while being compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22661] New: Functions cannot be interpreted while being compiled   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22662] ICE caused by forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22662] ICE caused by forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22662] ICE caused by forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22662] ICE caused by forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22662] New: ICE caused by forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22663] Module is not recognized inside an "if"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22663] New: Module is not recognized inside an "if"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22664] New: Disassembler mistakes rdtscp for invlpg ECX   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: qualified enum values should be of enum type on the D side, not int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: qualified enum values should be of enum type on the D side, not int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: qualified enum values should be of enum type on the D side, not int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] ImportC: qualified enum values should be of enum type on the D side, not int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22665] New: ImportC: enums are not "implicitly converting" to their own type.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22666] ImportC: Error: attributes should be specified before the function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22666] ImportC: Error: attributes should be specified before the function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22666] ImportC: Error: attributes should be specified before the function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22666] ImportC: Error: attributes should be specified before the function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22666] New: ImportC: Error: attributes should be specified before the function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22667] New: Nullable of struct containing unrelated Nullable errors with "inout can only be declared inside inout function"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22667] Nullable of struct containing unrelated Nullable errors with "inout can only be declared inside inout function"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22667] Nullable of struct containing unrelated Nullable errors with "inout can only be declared inside inout function"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22667] Nullable of struct containing unrelated Nullable errors with "inout can only be declared inside inout function"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22667] Nullable of struct containing unrelated Nullable errors with "inout can only be declared inside inout function"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22668] Deprecation when a deprecated method overrides another deprecated method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22668] Deprecation when a deprecated method overrides another deprecated method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22668] New: Deprecation when a deprecated method overrides another deprecated method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22669] New: OpenBSD: Sync socket.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22669] OpenBSD: Sync socket.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22669] OpenBSD: Sync socket.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22670] New: Support *BSD kqueue-backed API-compatible inotify shim library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22670] Support *BSD kqueue-backed API-compatible inotify shim library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22670] Support *BSD kqueue-backed API-compatible inotify shim library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22671] New: Please update the release schedule for 2022 :)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22672] Allow casting from TypeTuple to TypeTuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22672] Allow casting from TypeTuple to TypeTuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22672] New: Allow casting from TypeTuple to TypeTuple   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22673] New: .array of a range with length preallocates without checking if the length was lying or not.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22674] New: ImportC: compatible types declared in different translation units are not treated equivalent in D.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22675] ICE: passing the noreturn type as int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22675] ICE: passing the noreturn type as int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22675] New: ICE: passing the noreturn type as int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22676] New: fullyQualifiedName fails to compile with 2.098.1 relese -- there is some issue with call to __traits(isScalar ..   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22677] New: thompson.d(846): Unrecognized instruction cast(IR)112   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22678] -verrors=context does not account for tabs when printing cursor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22678] -verrors=context does not account for tabs when printing cursor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22678] New: -verrors=context does not account for tabs when printing cursor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22679] "Error: identifier expected following `package'" when module has 'debug' in it's name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22679] "Error: identifier expected following `package'" when module has 'debug' in it's name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22679] "Error: identifier expected following `package'" when module has 'debug' in it's name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22679] New: "Error: identifier expected following `package'" when module has 'debug' in it's name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22680] @safe hole with destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22680] @safe hole with destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22680] @safe hole with destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22680] @safe hole with destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22680] New: @safe hole with destructors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22681] New: rt_moduleTlsCtor/Dtor() don't work with phobos dynamically linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22681] rt_moduleTlsCtor/Dtor() don't work with phobos dynamically linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22682] New: `pragma(mangle)` does not work at local scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22683] core.math.rndtonl can't be linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22683] core.math.rndtonl can't be linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22683] core.math.rndtonl can't be linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22683] New: core.math.rndtonl can't be linked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22684] New: Templated constructor doesn't have class qualifier   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22685] New: Template function instantiated with lambda and overload is nested incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22685] Template function instantiated with lambda and overload is nested incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22685] Template function instantiated with lambda and overload is nested incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22685] Template function instantiated with lambda and overload is nested incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22685] Template function instantiated with lambda and overload is nested incorrectly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22686] ICE: dmd segfaults on invalid member reference in static function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22686] ICE: dmd segfaults on invalid member reference in static function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22686] ICE: dmd segfaults on invalid member reference in static function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22686] ICE: dmd segfaults on invalid member reference in static function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22686] New: ICE: dmd segfaults on invalid member reference in static function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22687] New: GC Leak Detector is not freeing all addresses   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22688] Control flow analysis is confused by goto case in loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22688] New: Control flow analysis is confused by goto case in loop   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22689] New: kFreeBSD bindings broken after switch to CRuntime_Glibc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22690] New: broken link in core_memory.html to core.GC.free   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22691] [diagnostic] mismatched braces still painful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22691] [diagnostic] mismatched braces still painful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22691] New: [diagnostic] mismatched braces still painful   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22692] New: Underground Rekordz link is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22692] Underground Rekordz link is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22692] Underground Rekordz link is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22692] Underground Rekordz link is dead   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22693] New: Lambda accepts auto parameter but fails on instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22694] New: template mixin with UDA not recognized inside function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22694] template mixin with UDA not recognized inside function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22695] New: std.traits.isBuiltinType is false for typeof(null)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22695] std.traits.isBuiltinType is false for typeof(null)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22695] std.traits.isBuiltinType is false for typeof(null)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22696] New: getSymbolsByUDA can't be used in static foreach over parent type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22697] New: Segfault when accessing a recursive lambda declared inside a function generated with a mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22697] Segfault when accessing a recursive lambda declared inside a function generated with a mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22697] Segfault when accessing a recursive lambda declared inside a function generated with a mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22697] Segfault when accessing a recursive lambda declared inside a function generated with a mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22697] Segfault when accessing a recursive lambda declared inside a function generated with a mixin template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22698] ImportC: nested struct tag stored in wrong scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22698] ImportC: nested struct tag stored in wrong scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22698] ImportC: nested struct tag stored in wrong scope   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22698] importC: no definition of struct for nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22698] New: importC: no definition of struct for nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22699] importC: assignment cannot be used as a condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22699] importC: assignment cannot be used as a condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22699] importC: assignment cannot be used as a condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22699] New: importC: assignment cannot be used as a condition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22700] Error: undefined symbol: core.internal.dassert.inFinalizer and core.internal.dassert.miniFormatFakeAttributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22700] Error: undefined symbol: core.internal.dassert.inFinalizer and core.internal.dassert.miniFormatFakeAttributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22700] New: Error: undefined symbol: core.internal.dassert.inFinalizer and core.internal.dassert.miniFormatFakeAttributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22701] New: std.typecons.apply needlessly checks if the predicate is callable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22701] std.typecons.apply needlessly checks if the predicate is callable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22701] std.typecons.apply needlessly checks if the predicate is callable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22701] std.typecons.apply needlessly checks if the predicate is callable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22702] druntime not compliant with D spec re getLinkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22702] druntime not compliant with D spec re getLinkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22702] New: druntime not compliant with D spec re getLinkage   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22703] importC: C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type rejects some C types.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22703] importC: C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type rejects some C types.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22703] importC: C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type rejects some C types.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22703] importC: C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type rejects some C types.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22703] New: importC: C++11 unscoped enums with underlying type rejects some C types.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22704] Linker error when running the public unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22704] Linker error when running the public unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22704] New: Linker error when running the public unittests   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] importC: forward reference to struct's typedef gives "struct already exists"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] importC: forward reference to struct's typedef gives "struct already exists"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] importC: forward reference to struct typedef gives struct already exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] importC: forward reference to struct typedef gives struct already exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] importC: forward reference to struct typedef gives struct already exists   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22705] New: importC: forward reference to struct's typedef gives "struct already exists"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22706] New: Bad error message when trying to explicitly instantiate a function template with an auto ref parameter   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22707] New: Windows: LIB env variable for link.exe is overwritten   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22707] Windows: LIB env variable for link.exe is overwritten   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22708] New: switch statement with an undefined symbol results in many errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22709] [dip1000] slice of static array can be escaped in @safe using ref arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22709] [dip1000] slice of static array can be escaped in @safe using ref arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22709] New: [dip1000] slice of static array can be escaped in @safe using ref arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22710] CTFE on bitfields does not account for field width   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22710] CTFE on bitfields does not account for field width   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22710] CTFE on bitfields does not account for field width   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22710] Different behaviour of bitfields between CTFE and runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22710] New: Different behaviour of bitfields between CTFE and runtime   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22711] Effect of template UDAs on instance members is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22711] Effect of template UDAs on instance members is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22711] New: Effect of template UDAs on instance members is undocumented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22712] New: suboptimal register allocation (working title)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22712] suboptimal register allocation (working title)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22713] ImportC: op= not correctly implemented for bit fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22713] ImportC: op= not correctly implemented for bit fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22713] ImportC: op= not correctly implemented for bit fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22713] New: ImportC: op= not correctly implemented for bit fields   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22714] ICE: Assertion failure in ClassDeclaration::isBaseOf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22714] ICE: Assertion failure in ClassDeclaration::isBaseOf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22714] New: ICE: Assertion failure in ClassDeclaration::isBaseOf   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22715] New: compiler should issue warning when passing D:long as c_long to func.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22716] New: Forum: wrong quote nesting as a result of slightly broken markdown syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22717] New: object.TypeInfo_Struct.equals swaps lhs and rhs parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22717] object.TypeInfo_Struct.equals swaps lhs and rhs parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22717] object.TypeInfo_Struct.equals swaps lhs and rhs parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22717] object.TypeInfo_Struct.equals swaps lhs and rhs parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22717] object.TypeInfo_Struct.equals swaps lhs and rhs parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22718] Grammar for case/default statement is wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22718] New: Grammar for case/default statement is   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22719] New: Fallthrough detection falls through.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22720] New: Overload of template and alias to template instantiation that is also a template fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22721] importC: some gnu builtins are rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22721] New: importC: some gnu builtins are rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22722] ImportC: parser doesn’t understand `asm volatile` syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 22722] New: ImportC: parser doesn’t understand `asm volatile` syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3538] Default value of alias template parameter is instantiated only once.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3818] Generic error message for wrong foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3818] Generic error message for wrong foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5096] More readable unpaired brace error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5096] More readable unpaired brace error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 5096] More readable unpaired brace error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6132] extern (C) Silently Ignored Within D Classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 6132] extern (C) Silently Ignored Within D Classes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8102] Error messages that point to the line numbers that lack the ending semicolon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8102] Error messages that point to the line numbers that lack the ending semicolon   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 8954] Missing line number in error message for uncollable destructor/postblit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9205] Better error message for misplaced pure nothrow tags   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 9308] dynamic array's TypeInfo_Array.value is null of simple basic type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Mon Jan 31 22:27:40 UTC 2022
Archived on: Mon Jan 31 22:27:45 UTC 2022

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...