FLTK native in 'D'. Would that be useful?

[Carlos Santander]

MatthiasM escribió:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> as promised, I have put a first attempt at D-FLTK onto our Subversion 
> system. The test application "hello" runs already on OS X.
> 
> Everyone interested, please feel free to download, play, improve and 
> comment! You can send patches to me directly. You can also join the 
> general fltk newsgroup and discuss D-FLTK there (until the C++ folks 
> complain about too much traffic ;-)
> 
> Anyway, I hop ya'll enjoy and don't get scared by my "D" style.
> 
> 
> Here's how you get the source:
> 
> 
> svn co http://svn.easysw.com/public/fltk/fltk/branches/branch-D-1.1 
> d-fltk-1.1.x
> 
> 
> All "D" sources are in - um - "D". The rest of the FLTK archive is 
> intact to make it easy to compare "D" and "C++" code.
> 
> Matthias

I gave it a try, and it worked, although I had to add "-fdeprecated" to the 
Makefile compile rule (are you using gdc 0.19?)

You should add "module" lines to the std/c/osx/* files. Also, when they're 
complete (if they're not already), you could ask Walter or David for inclusion 
in Phobos/GPhobos.

Finally, you have code like this:

version (Apple) {
   public import fl.mac;
}

version (X11) {
   public import fl.x11;
}

version (Win32) {
   public import fl.win32;
}

(I intentionally uncommented a couple of lines). I think it would be better if 
you added "else" clauses:

version (Apple) {
   public import fl.mac;
}
else version (X11) {
   public import fl.x11;
}
else version (Win32) {
   public import fl.win32;
}

Just in case.

Keep up this work because it's looking good.

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal