FLTK native in 'D'. Would that be useful?
BCS at pathlink.com
Fri Jul 21 15:52:19 PDT 2006
> I am one of the co-authors of FLTK. I like 'D' and as a test I have manually
> translated parts of FLTK into
> native 'D' code. This is obvioulsy very different from just writing a wrapper,
> more involved, but also
> more rewarding.
> Before I jump into manually porting a few hundred thousand lines of code, I
> would really like to know
> first if the 'D' community is interested in such a thing at all and if I can get
> sufficient support and a
> reasonable number of users.
> What do you folks think?
> FLTK is a Fast and Light user interface Tool Kit. It sets directly onto the low
> lever interfaces of the three
> main supported platforms (MSWindows:WIN32, Unix including Linux: X11, Mac OS X:
> FLTK is in use by several thousand people all over the world. It comes with a
> visual user interface
> designer that spews out readable C++ (and after the coversion 'D').
> Come check it out at http://www.fltk.org/
I would be interested in seeing a good GUI kit for D, FLTK looks as good
as (or better) the others I've seen.
BTW, does FLTK access the native GUI framework, or does it shell around
More information about the Digitalmars-d-dwt