Anonomous class instances

[Bill Baxter]

Frank Benoit wrote:
> Bill Baxter schrieb:
>> I see a lot of this in the DWT examples:
>>
>>    new class() Listener { ... }
>>
>> Didn't even know you could do that till I saw it in DWT.  But I just 
>> now ran across an example like this:
>>
>>    new class Listener { ... }
>>
>> Is there a difference?  If I had to guess I'd say the first one was 
>> creating a no-argument anonymous class template, but I have no idea 
>> why you'd want that instead of a regular anonymous class.
>>
>> --bb
> 
> I think they are the same. The () is the optional arguments list to the 
> ctor call.
> 

That makes sense.  Now that I think about it, there wouldn't be much 
sense in making a template out of a class that will only ever have one 
instance.

--bb