nospam at nospam.com
Thu Apr 17 04:26:53 PDT 2008
John Reimer <terminal.node at gmail.com> wrote in news:fu6flc$1c2m$1
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:22:05 +0000, JMNorris wrote:
>> As the swt port is being called dwt, I hope that the ongoing jface is or
>> will be called dface.
> Actually, it's a bit of a stretch calling DWT "DWT". It's really just a
> port of SWT, not a new thing. The name "DWT" has kind of stuck, though;
> so, among other things, it's here to stay.
> JFace is another matter. Naming it "DFace" would have implications that
> just wouldn't be suitable for any respectable D port. :)
Actually, I find it kinda cute--the D port with an attitude. :-) At any
rate, it's probably better than DJFace: there's probably a reason the DJ
is on radio rather than TV, and it's not his voice.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-dwt