DWT as lib or source include?
wbaxter at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 11:36:25 PDT 2008
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Frank Benoit
<keinfarbton at googlemail.com> wrote:
> There are allways questions about the lib and linker problems.
> I use for my own development only source include. That is for me OK in speed
> and its the most reliable and easiest way to handle it.
> Now i think about removing the default dsss build target to make libs and
> remove it from the installation guide.
> The dsss.conf files in dwt-linux/dwt-win/dwt-addons would no more have
> dsss.conf file. Or perhaps just one to test compilation.
> And the dsss.conf in dwt-sample just include the sources per relative import
> path ( -I )
> What do you think?
What's wrong with switching the dsss files to "type=sourcelibrary"?
That's what I already do with dwt-addons.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-dwt