DWT as lib or source include?

[yidabu]

On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:09:34 +0200
Frank Benoit <keinfarbton at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Bill Baxter schrieb:
> > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Frank Benoit
> > <keinfarbton at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> There are allways questions about the lib and linker problems.
> >>
> >> I use for my own development only source include. That is for me OK in speed
> >> and its the most reliable and easiest way to handle it.
> >>
> >> Now i think about removing the default dsss build target to make libs and
> >> remove it from the installation guide.
> >> The dsss.conf files in dwt-linux/dwt-win/dwt-addons would no more have
> >> dsss.conf file. Or perhaps just one to test compilation.
> >> And the dsss.conf in dwt-sample just include the sources per relative import
> >> path ( -I )
> >> What do you think?
> > 
> > 
> > What's wrong with switching the dsss files to "type=sourcelibrary"?
> > That's what I already do with dwt-addons.
> > 
> > --bb
> 
> it is still one more step that can be forgotten and makes it for me more 
> difficult to give efficient support. There are still problems for ppl 
> building the simples DWT prog.
> 
> I was more thinking about if build time and executable size makes the 
> use of direct sources unacceptable for users.

I always use DWT as lib for the build time.


-- 
yidabu <yidabu.spam at gmail.com>
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dwin

D 语言-中文(D Chinese):
http://www.d-programming-language-china.org/
http://bbs.d-programming-language-china.org/
http://dwin.d-programming-language-china.org/
http://scite4d.d-programming-language-china.org/