Ugh, we need a dface

[Frank Benoit]

Bill Baxter schrieb:
> I was just porting some JFace snippets to try to get a better feel for 
> how it works and what it can do.  And all I can say is ugh.  It's just 
> waaaaay too Java-esque for D.  Absolutely everything is an interface 
> that casts every bit of data it handles to and from Object.  Ick.
> 
> Some sort of slightly more D-ish way to wrap and enhance DWT would sure 
> be nice.  Something that takes advantage of D's templates instead of 
> casting all over the place.
> 
> --bb

For such, we sure do not need to change the name ;)

Do you have concrete suggestions how to do that?