Qt Creator with D
Gour D.
gour at atmarama.net
Thu Oct 14 02:59:42 PDT 2010
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:32:15 +0200
>>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Pleh <gonzo at web.at> wrote:
Matthias> The D-projectmanager, I was working on, is derived on the
Matthias> generic-projectmangaer. This way we could also use another
Matthias> buildsystem or a compiler direct. But it should be done in a
Matthias> way, to support all D-compilers (dmd,gdc,ldc,...)
I was thinking whether to use CMake or Waf as build system for D and
decided to use the latter (http://code.google.com/p/waf/) which
already has built-in support for D and it is very extensible -
everything is just Python.
Matthias> I've heard, someone is working on a cmakeD2, which could be
Matthias> easily added to Qt-Creator, but there isn't a releasy yet.
So, I believe that Waf can serve very nicely.
Considering that I would use Waf with CodeBlocks as well, now I'm
curious what would be the best option as D IDE:
a) adding support to CodeBlocks
b) patching QtCreator or
c) D.Dev (http://d-dev-ide.blogspot.com/)
Matthias> > But it's something to build on, if pushing QtD as the new
Matthias> > official GUI ?
I'd say that QtD looks as the best/most_complete GUI option for
D. Considering that, what would you recommend to base D-IDE on: a), b)
or c) ?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-ide/attachments/20101014/79723df7/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Digitalmars-d-ide
mailing list