Emacs or Vi? Why the answer is neither.

[Gyula Gubacsi]

"I used to be a Visual Studio user as well, then i t..."

Nooooooo!!!!!! Your letter has been cut by the wire :)

On 1 May 2012 19:06, so <so at so.so> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 at 00:52:22 UTC, F i L wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 2 June 2011 at 16:54:17 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>
>>> It seems to be article season, and I'm on a bit of a punditry mood, so
>>> here's a blog post I wrote recently:
>>>
>>> http://pureconcepture.**blogspot.com/2011/05/emacs-or-**
>>> vi-why-answer-is-neither.html<http://pureconcepture.blogspot.com/2011/05/emacs-or-vi-why-answer-is-neither.html>
>>>
>>> It's not about D, but it's a software development issue that has popped
>>> up several times here in the NG... :)
>>>
>>
>> Good article. I completely agree with your conclusions.
>>
>> I really can't see how anyone would want to use a "text editor" over an
>> "IDE".
>>
>
> Did you use any of them? Emacs already is an IDE, much better than many
> around. Yes vim is "the" text editor, if you are using command line
> screen/tmux, vim is awesome. If only it had a better gdb/debugger
> integration, then it would be complete.
>
>
>  I mean, an IDE _is_ a text-editor + tools that help you manage projects
>> and understand source structure.
>>
>
> There are tons of developers out there using vim and as it looks like they
> manage to do those somehow. No one forcing them :)
>
> I used to be a Visual Studio user as well, then i t...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-ide/attachments/20120503/cbccd3ea/attachment.html>