D Development Tools 0.7.0 Preview Release

[bioinfornatics]

On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 15:58:06 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 13:29:35 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>> On 08/07/2013 09:17, eles wrote:
>>> On Friday, 5 July 2013 at 20:38:28 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>
>> Why shouldn't it be there? The standard lib is divided in two 
>> parts, the runtime and Phobos.
>
> I agree, I was expecting:
>
> /usr/include/dmd/druntime
>
> instead of:
>
> /usr/include/dmd/druntime/import
>
> just like the phobos has this path:
>
> /usr/include/dmd/phobos
>
> and not this one:
>
> /usr/include/dmd/phobos/import
>
>
>> There has to be an object.di installed somewhere in the system 
>> (as well as the other standard library header files). It could 
>> be in a zip or some other binary format though (hopefully not).
>
> For the time being, it seems that gdc works without (knowing 
> about) it...
>
>> The build file stuff is unrelated to the library locations 
>> detection. But yeah, seems the -v2 switch is outdated now, 
>> I'll remove it from default response file.
>
> Yes, but both the layout (locations) of the files and the 
> compiler version do. I think newer compiler versions are simply 
> not aware about a "v1" of D.
>
> Thank you very much.


for include dir the FHS way is /usr/include/d/<package name> as 
is done into deian and fedora