Better named tuple support?

Jethro via Digitalmars-d-ide digitalmars-d-ide at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 16 14:00:59 PDT 2017


Debugging tuples is pretty hard to decypher. Instead of using 
_expand_field, could it be possible to display the names of the 
fields of they exist?

After all, the type is listed with the names so it should be easy 
to get them from the type string and just replace the displayed 
_expand_field with them.




More information about the Digitalmars-d-ide mailing list