Fixing the -march/-mcpu situation

David Nadlinger code at
Sun Oct 6 12:29:54 PDT 2013

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Paolo Invernizzi
<paolo.invernizzi at> wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 October 2013 at 22:39:55 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
>> But I suppose the most reasonable choice is indeed to go with the LLVM
>> tool naming scheme (which we already do now), as we differ from other
>> compilers based on LLVM in that we also offer all the internal
>> options. So, (1) would indeed be the most consistent way of handling
>> things.
> +1

The old new behavior has landed in Git master.

>> Now I just have to figure out what the reason for having the »you must
>> specify a target triple as well with -mtriple when using the -arch
>> option« was. Or just remove it, as it really doesn't seem to make a
>> lot of sense.
> If you find the sense of that, please post it!

Still no idea, though.


More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc mailing list