A little benchmark in D and C

[bearophile via digitalmars-d-ldc]

David Nadlinger:

> A quick test suggests that this seems to be a matter of GCC's 
> optimizer picking up on something that LLVM's doesn't, as Clang 
> 3.4.2 produces an executable just as slow/fast than that by LDC 
> built against LLVM 3.4.2.

So it looks like a ER/bug report for LLVM instead of LDC :-)

Bye,
bearophile