A little benchmark in D and C

bearophile via digitalmars-d-ldc digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Fri Jul 4 09:59:18 PDT 2014


> David Nadlinger:
>
>> A quick test suggests that this seems to be a matter of GCC's 
>> optimizer picking up on something that LLVM's doesn't, as 
>> Clang 3.4.2 produces an executable just as slow/fast than that 
>> by LDC built against LLVM 3.4.2.

Discussed a bit in the llvm irc channel and then I have reported 
it:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20205

Bye,
bearophile


More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc mailing list