Weird thing about building ldc under VS2013 x86
Toby Chen via digitalmars-d-ldc
digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Fri Sep 26 14:19:23 PDT 2014
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 16:47:37 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
>>> OT: Why would you have to go with x86? Just curious.
>> Well, I don't have to. I just feel better with the BSD
>> licensed llvm, and llvm works closer to windows ecosystem than
>> gcc. I'm just trying it out.
> ? I asked about 32 bit software, not llvm vs gcc.
Sorry for my misunderstanding. However, I said that I do not have
to go with 32bit, and I'm not going to struggle with x86 vs x64
nor LLVM vs GCC vs MSVC.
Just, as a compiler, the lack of x86 support could be fatal since
x86 has not yet faded out of history.
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc