Commandline compatibility with Clang?

Kai Nacke via digitalmars-d-ldc digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Sat Oct 24 14:47:29 PDT 2015


On Friday, 23 October 2015 at 08:37:38 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 19:16:00 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>> There are 2 reasons for the naming of command line options. 
>> First, ldc predates Clang. Second, ldc links against LLVM and 
>> inherits all the command line options which are also not 
>> compatible with Clang.
>
> How is that? AFAIK all llvm tools use gcc-like -o option.

You not only want the -o option but also all of the -f/-m 
options. The LLVM libraries do not use -f/-m options.

Regards,
Kai


More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc mailing list