wrapping llvm_expect in a likely(x)/unlikely(x)?

[rsw0x via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On Thursday, 29 October 2015 at 06:28:36 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> Is this possible?
> I already do it for GDC with a function wrapper, but LDC 
> doesn't seem to work the same way. It generates the expected 
> code if I manually used llvm_expect(T,V) but not if I wrap it 
> in a convenience likely/unlikely function.

I feel silly now, all I needed was default parameters - doh.
Sorry for the noise.