[WiP] Creating a snap package of LDC

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 20:24:44 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> For your particular use case, however – in a controlled and 
> very specific situation –, wouldn't a small wrapper around the 
> GCC binary to supplant the necessary arguments work just as 
> well? If GCC doesn't work without any additional arguments, 
> this is arguably a bug anyway.

It's pretty much what I've been trying to do, but the choice of 
wrapper doesn't seem to be respected.

Is there anything problematic with this ldc2.conf that you can 
see?  Any reason why it might not be respecting the `-gcc` flag 
included in the config?
https://gist.github.com/WebDrake/229645efeca14fa54b0b1c82bcbb6477