Version of LDC in Fedora

Tue Jul 12 02:02:19 PDT 2016

On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 16:18 +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis via
digitalmars-d-ldc wrote:
> […]
> 
> So, in this case it's not a problem is with gdc's search path not
> ldc. Even
> if I put the include files elsewhere -but still inside
> /usr/include/d?
> 

I am not sure where the fault lies, all I can say is there is clearly a
problem between the gdc and ldc packages on Debian.

gdc is not packaged for Fedora (hiss, boo) so there is no problem with
the ldc package there. Well except it is 0.16 not 1.0.

-- 

Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-ldc/attachments/20160712/ea02486a/attachment.sig>