LDC 1.2.0-beta2 has been released!

kinke via digitalmars-d-ldc digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Thu Apr 6 06:52:11 PDT 2017

On Wednesday, 5 April 2017 at 21:59:22 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
> With the large performance regression for mir [1], are we OK 
> with building the release binaries with LLVM 4.0, or shall we 
> use LLVM 3.9?
> Cheers,
>   Johan
> [1] https://github.com/libmir/mir-glas/issues/18

Hmm don't know, that's just *one* runtime performance regression. 
There are also cases where 4.0 brings a speed-up by 150% compared 
to 3.9.1, see the results for SciMark2 here for example: 
(I guess the fix isn't on the Clang side, but on LLVM's).

More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc mailing list