LTS master CI testing

[Joakim via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On Friday, 4 August 2017 at 19:02:59 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
> Hi all,
>   For LTS master, can we drop the Windows testing?
> I think LTS master only makes sense for being able to bootstrap 
> from source. But that's only relevant on Linuxes, right?

Why would the OS matter?  It's so we can port to new platforms by 
first building the C++-only ltsmaster compiler with the C++ 
toolchain for the platform.  For example, if someone picks up the 
new Windows on ARM laptops, coming out in a couple months, they 
could easily build ltsmaster ldc for it, though the stdlib might 
require some tweaking.

> I feel it'd make things easier if we just drop as much support 
> as possible, so that we can spend our energy where it matters.

Honestly, I don't care about Windows and don't mind dropping 
this, just don't see why it'd only matter for linux.