C++ binding issues with "overloading" pragma mangle
ParticlePeter via digitalmars-d-ldc
digitalmars-d-ldc at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 22 08:26:08 PDT 2017
On Thursday, 22 June 2017 at 15:03:05 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2017, at 15:53, ParticlePeter via digitalmars-d-ldc
>> Is this some precaution or is unique mangling really
>> necessary? If not, could this requirement be removed?
> It is merely a precaution – the requirement could be removed by
> having LDC insert bitcasts as appropriate on the LLVM IR level.
> — David
Thanks, I'll post an issue on github and link this thread.
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc