LDC 1.4.0

[Joakim via digitalmars-d-ldc]

On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 13:07:51 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 September 2017 at 12:28:39 UTC, kinke wrote:
>> Yep that is/was the reason. Symbolic file links on Windows are 
>> very uncommon, as they require an NTFS file system and Vista 
>> or newer.
>
> A hard link should be fine for a file.
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363860%28v=vs.85%29.aspx docs say hard links were supported on xp.

Or, worst case, we could even provide a tiny binary that simply 
forwards to ldc, as ldmd2 currently does after adjusting for 
ldc's flags.