lld-link should tolerate foo.o
noone at nowhere.com
Thu Jan 10 18:57:42 UTC 2019
On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 11:58:48 UTC, kinke wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 January 2019 at 10:46:27 UTC, V V Kozlov wrote:
>> Shouldn't this tolerate .o files? (Clang does)
> I don't think so.
I checked; both MS link.exe and lld-link support *.o just fine.
LDC's supported file extensions depend on the target (e.g., it
rejects .o for Windows targets and .obj for non-Windows ones).
More information about the digitalmars-d-ldc