Interface question

[Paolo Invernizzi]

xs0 wrote:

> Well, as far as I can tell, you can't create a new object without a new 
> expression, in which you need to state the exact type, so even if you 
> could specify a constructor signature in an interface, you still 
> couldn't generically create an object.

That's true...

> If you could do it, though, what would the rest of the code look like? 
> (I think you can't code around explicitly listing types somewhere, so 
> I'm interested what you feel would be gained).

That's true again... auto a = new SomeInterface is meaningless, as you 
cannot tell what 'concrete' class you need.

My fault.

---
Paolo