Iterators recap

[Bill Baxter]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> Too bad the iterator discussions fizzled out without anything getting 
>> decided.
> 
> I think the design was pretty well settled when things ended.  The next 
> step would be a sample implementation so folks could wrangle over 
> syntax.  It's on my "to do" list, but I'm a bit short on free time at 
> the moment.

Huh.  So what is your understanding of what the consensus was?

--bb