Why do we still need/use .di 'header' files?

Chris Nicholson-Sauls ibisbasenji at gmail.com
Fri Nov 17 12:33:11 PST 2006

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Don Clugston" <dac at nospam.com.au> wrote in message 
> news:ejkbnm$1qb1$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>Protection attributes and many other things are not in the decorated 
>>What about templates, and conditional compilation?
> This is why there needs to be a "D object file" format.. :P  That would be a 
> killer feature IMO. 

It might kill C compatability in some cases... /but/ having such a thing, with perhaps a 
compiler switch to emit "legacy" object files, would be nice -- and would make DDL far, 
far simpler to implement I'm sure.

-- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list