Why can't I inherit (extend) structs?
lijat.meREM at OVEgmail.com
Mon Oct 16 09:49:20 PDT 2006
Derek Parnell wrote:
> And I'd go so far as to say that the term 'inheritance' is a bit strong.
> Maybe just 'derivation' as we would be deriving a new struct definition
> from existing definitions, but there is no implied linkage between them at
If it is just derived from that is wanted wouldn't it bee easier with a
syntax like this.
the struct bar would now have four fields (a,b,c,d)
this way their is no way to misunderstand it for inheritance and if one
want a foo* one can always take the addres of the first element.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn