writefln and ASCII

John Reimer terminal.node at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 21:39:32 PDT 2006


Steve,

Very good, clear explanation, and very helpful: in reading this, you  
almost made me feel like I was from the inside looking out -- that's  
certainly quite a talent in writing.  I got more out of this post then the  
last.

It seems I might have hit a bit left of center in my original response  
(specifically my interpretation of your perspective), for which I  
apologize.  Although I stick to my original opinions in most details, you  
certainly clarified a few things that were unclear to me and showed that I  
didn't have a complete grasp of your perspective.

All the best,

John


On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:02:48 -0700, Steve Horne  
<stephenwantshornenospam100 at aol.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:08:52 +0200, Don Clugston <dac at nospam.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Steve -
>> I don't know why I read a thread with a boring title like "writefln and
>> ASCII" -- but I'm glad I did. I've read your post several times to try
>> to get a better understanding.
>
> Ah. Be careful with that. Consider...
>
> 1.  Balanced and reasonable
> 2.  Mostly accurate
> 3.  Venting out of control
>
> Multiple choice. Which is the odd one out? ;-)
>

<< snip >>



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list