Why are opCall's not implicitely assignable?

[Ivan Senji]

Carlos Santander wrote:
> Ivan Senji escribió:
>> Karen Lanrap wrote:
>> ...
>>    with car.roof
>>    {
>>       .topcoat = COLOR.RED;
>>       .undercoat = COLOR.WHITE;
>>    }
>>
>> else (it is a property of type coat):
>>
>>    with car.roof
>>    {
>>       .topcoat.color = COLOR.RED;
>>       .undercoat.color = COLOR.WHITE;
>>    }
>>
>>
>>>
>>> (By the way: forgetting to delete a point can have desastrous results 
>>> in D.)
>>
>> What point?
> 
> What Karen is saying is that your examples should be:

Ooops, of course they should be without that ".", but are you sure that 
is what Karen is talking about? Hmm, have to reread...