array construction without heap alloc

[0ffh]

0ffh wrote:
> That's really unfortunate, especially as the array does
> quite definitely end up on the stack. So with a static
> array and an array literal you would get the worst of
> both worlds. I'll investigate that.

Yup, it seems to eat memory, that's a bad sign!
Sorry for misleading you, but this is really unexpected!

regards, frank