Inconsistency of .mangleof?

[Frits van Bommel]

Ary Borenszweig wrote:
> Object.mangleof == "C6Object"
> Interface.mangleof == "S6object9Interface"
> 
> Both are defined in the module object.d
> 
> Why Object.mangleof isn't "C6object6Object"? It also happens with 
> ClassInfo ("C9ClassInfo").
> 
> I'm currently using mangled representations of types to store references 
> to other types in Descent, while at the same time respecting the D spec. 
> Then I search for a symbol in the hierarchy by parsing the mangled name. 
> But because of the inconsistency of "C6Object" I'll have to hardcode 
> that value means "Object in module object". Same as for other types in 
> module object (in other, user defined modules it doesn't happen).
> 
> Is there any reason for this?

I always assumed it was so those classes don't need to be directly in 
object.d, allowing them to be in publicly imported modules instead, 
without breaking linking. This way, references to stuff belonging to 
these classes may be emitted without checking to see what module they're 
actually in.

IIRC the same happens for std/typeinfo/*.d, by the way.