Exception Handling, Scope and Destructor questions

Jarrett Billingsley kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 12 18:01:28 PST 2007

"Kirk McDonald" <kirklin.mcdonald at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:eqqjbc$ebp$1 at digitalmars.com...

>> Lastly, the catch() does not need to have a scope, yes? something like 
>> catch(Exception e) ProcessGeneric(); in summary of the code above?
> Yes, this is allowed.

Wow, you learn something new every day :)  Never knew you could make 
try/catch/finally statements without the braces.  Huh.  I'll have to add 
that to MiniD. 

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list