kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 12 19:06:26 PST 2007
"Tomas Lindquist Olsen" <tomas at famolsen.dk> wrote in message
news:eqr9n4$1a4a$2 at digitalmars.com...
> Guess that is what I was trying to avoid.
You would think that this kind of stuff could be automated. I mean, if I'm
in a variadic function, and I call another variadic function with '...' in
its parameter list, shouldn't that be obvious what I mean? Can't the
compiler just go "oh, well I guess I can just forward the _arguments and
_argptr params to that variadic function"? It seems like something that
would be relatively easy to implement. I don't know, maybe it has something
to do with the code generation.
> Yeah I don't want to go this way. Though it's cool that a tuple can be
> passed as variadic args.
I love tuples so much.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn