Question about template mixins as nested functions.

[Gerald Stocker]

Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:31:07 -0500, Gerald Stocker wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a question about using a template mixin to add a nested function 
>> to a class method...
> 
> I have trouble with mixin templates too. I believe the effect you see is
> because the mixin introduces its own scope and you have to qualify
> reference that are outside the mixin.
> 
> However, the new mixin(Statement) might be useful to you ...
> 

It is, thanks! It turns out several of the things I was trying (and 
sometimes failing) to do with template mixins make more sense as 
statment mixins.

--Gerald