Package-level DDoc?

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Robert Fraser" <fraserofthenight at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:f8b5p0$1pfc$1 at digitalmars.com...

> Also, what's up with the "package" keyword? Does it just not work or is it 
> doing some scary behavior modification stuff?

Despite Daniel's explanation, your intuition is correct about package not 
working correctly.  There are some bugs (143, 257) which have been sitting 
in the bugzilla for over a year with no resolution regarding the 
functionality of the package attribute.  Furthermore, package makes any 
member functions it's applied to non-virtual -- which isn't documented and 
makes no sense.  The interaction of package with other attributes is also 
undefined.  *sigh* if only things like this got more attention than 
constness.