davidb wrote:
[snip]
> 5) line 62:
> if "for (;;) ... " has only one statement(?), you don't need
> enclosing {} (just cosmetics, but hey - 2 chars less typing *g*)
> (or did you use it here as a means to show your intention
> more clearly?)
[snip]
I know this is mainly a style thing however I've seen many bugs caused
by people who leave the scope brakes of the loop.