Rationale for classes as reference types

[Bill Baxter]

On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Steven Schveighoffer
<schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Bill Baxter" wrote

> I also would like this request to be granted:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2070

Although I can't say I've ever had a big need for that, it makes sense
that something like that should work.  Just from the standpoint of
making things nice and orthogonal.  I see no reason why you shouldn't
be able to put storage classes on anonymous variables like that.
Seems like your request would be pretty easy to implement too.

--bb