offsetof

[Heinz Traub]

Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:

> "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:g8kh8p$6c4$1 at digitalmars.com...
> 
> > It's actually exactly the opposite from how it's defined in the spec: you 
> > can only use offsetof on instances of user-defined types, not on the type 
> > itself.
> >
> > It makes _absolutely_ no sense, I know.  I can't help but feel it's a bug, 
> > but it's been this way for over 4 years.
> >
> 
> I take that back, it used to be this way but something seems to have 
> changed. 
> 
> 

Yes sir, it used to be this way. I also checked it in your engine (nonagon).