packageless modules == pure evil?

[bearophile]

Bill Baxter:
> For this reason it must be concluded that packageless modules are pure 
> evil, and should never ever be used.  Always always give your modules a 
> package even if it's just repeating the module name like "foo.foo".

If what you say is right, then the solution is to fix the module system of the compiler. It has other "bugs" I have discussed days ago.

Bye,
bearophile