packageless modules == pure evil?

[torhu]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> The problem that prompted this message was that I had a module called 
> just "blas" in one place and was trying to make another module called 
> "dflat.blas".  But that breaks plain "import blas".  It picks up the 
> "dflat.blas" rather than the packageless blas, even though I didn't 
> specify that I wanted "dflat.blas".

It works when I try a simple test. I have a.d, b/a.d, and then import 
just 'a' into test.d.

a.d:
---
module a;

char[] s = "a";
---

b/a.d:
---
module b.a;

char[] s = "b.a";
---

test.d:
---
import std.stdio;
import a;

void main()
{
	writefln(s);
}
---

running:
---
c:\prog\test\D\baxter>bud -exec test
a
---

So a more complex test is needed to show the problem.  Maybe importing 
from different include paths, etc?