A problem with AAs

[Robert Fraser]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> Most of this stems from them trying to be binary-compatible with C arrays. 
> They are allocated on the stack, you can't return them from functions, and 
> passing them passes a pointer.  I have no idea what's up with .init (D1's 
> std.traits actually takes advantage of this oddity to determine if a type is 
> a static array!), and the no-ref-out thing is weird.  I mean, it's because 
> you can't reassign what a static array variable points to.. 
> 

I'd be fine with all that if string (and other array) literals were 
dynamic by default.